Which of the following is most helpful to confirm a weak ABO subgroup?

Prepare for the ASCP International Test. Use flashcards and multiple choice questions with hints and explanations. Enhance your chances of success!

Multiple Choice

Which of the following is most helpful to confirm a weak ABO subgroup?

Explanation:
When you’re trying to confirm a weak ABO subgroup, you want evidence that the antigen is actually present on the red cells, just at a low density. Adsorption-elution does exactly that: you allow antibodies in the patient’s plasma to bind to red cells carrying the suspected antigen, then you elute those bound antibodies from the cell surface and test them. If the eluate contains anti-A or anti-B activity, it demonstrates that the corresponding antigen exists on the cells, even though direct testing showed only weak or no reactivity. This helps distinguish a true absence of the antigen from a very weak expression, which is the hallmark of a weak subgroup. The other options don’t provide the same confirmatory evidence. Testing with A1 lectin mainly helps separate A1 from A2 and some subtypes but doesn’t reliably reveal a weak subgroup in general. Neutralization isn’t a standard tool for confirming weak subgroups, and using anti-A,B would show whether antigens are present but not clearly demonstrate their weak expression on the cells.

When you’re trying to confirm a weak ABO subgroup, you want evidence that the antigen is actually present on the red cells, just at a low density. Adsorption-elution does exactly that: you allow antibodies in the patient’s plasma to bind to red cells carrying the suspected antigen, then you elute those bound antibodies from the cell surface and test them. If the eluate contains anti-A or anti-B activity, it demonstrates that the corresponding antigen exists on the cells, even though direct testing showed only weak or no reactivity. This helps distinguish a true absence of the antigen from a very weak expression, which is the hallmark of a weak subgroup.

The other options don’t provide the same confirmatory evidence. Testing with A1 lectin mainly helps separate A1 from A2 and some subtypes but doesn’t reliably reveal a weak subgroup in general. Neutralization isn’t a standard tool for confirming weak subgroups, and using anti-A,B would show whether antigens are present but not clearly demonstrate their weak expression on the cells.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy